Potato Please Guide

Potato Please Guide / Story & achievements

Potato Please · Story & achievements

Pavel’s school letters: what happens after you answer

The short replies at the supply window can sound alike until the next letter arrives. Follow the consequences reported for the dormitory, medical requests, classroom and director, then compare them with your own correspondence.

The dormitory fight and the discipline entry

In one recorded route, telling Pavel to stand up to the bully helped the younger boy recover his gloves. Pavel suffered a broken nose and was given kitchen duty. If you picked that answer, those details in his next letter indicate that the intervention happened, even though it brought a punishment. A Steam player who gave the same advice later obtained Your Own Executioner. Other advice matters across the rest of the shift.

The discipline-book fee concerns the record of trouble at school. The full-clear account describes an entry disappearing and the director treating Pavel more warmly after the fee was paid. An entry removed in this exchange does not settle later decisions about military assignment. Read the new letter before interpreting a future warning as a duplicate charge.

When you cannot pay for foot ointment or lice treatment

Keep playing after a medical refusal. A player who lacked money for both the injured foot and lice treatment explicitly reported continuing to the village train and unlocking Your Own Executioner. In a separate full-clear account the boy continued to write after both refusals, although his feet and scalp still troubled him. You can preserve a save before opening the envelope if you want to read both responses. A shortage here does not remove the remaining correspondence in these reported runs.

The other pupil, the banned leaflet and the missing eye contact

In the documented informant route, telling Pavel to report the leaflet had consequences for someone else. The other pupil was taken away and classmates avoided meeting Pavel’s eyes. Read for those details if you want to know whose situation changed after your answer. A separate Steam player says they declined to inform and still reached the executioner outcome. The report option gives you a particular classroom scene without proving it is necessary for the ending.

Why the knife is absent from the locker

In one played route Pavel kept the gift and hid it outside his locker. Pavel explicitly withholds the exact hiding place because he believes other people read the letters. The footage confirms only that he kept the knife outside the locker. The player at the depot does not receive a school inventory or a knife to equip in that scene. If you are documenting consequences, record the reply to the schoolboy and his account of what he did with the gift. The separate knife at your peeling table is an equipment purchase.

What paying for books changes before the director interview

A player who sent money for exam books reported that Pavel studied and nevertheless remained on the list for possible deployment. In that route, the later exchange with the director supplied the promise of a school near the capital. Record which letter you are reading before judging the result of paying for books. A player can see a military warning between paying for supplies and learning the director’s decision.

The classroom question about a father breaking the law precedes the director’s interest in the father’s work. The full-clear account says the teacher praised the law-first reply. The final original screenshot confirms that Pavel later told the director about his father’s job and letters. Seeing both in one playthrough does not establish that classroom praise alone guarantees the posting.

The recorded letter after the books arrive tells you how the school singled him out. A teacher praised a pupil for reporting his father for theft, asked what the class would do if their own father did something wrong, then wrote down Pavel’s surname when he kept quiet. After answering that law comes first, Pavel says she crossed his name out of the journal. The director later asked about his father’s job and letters. Several lines of the father’s writing were already underlined in red. This is the director reviewing the correspondence. It does not identify a passage that the player can edit or delete.

Steam player screenshot · Pavel’s letter about the director, packed belongings and collection of writing paper
Original source ↗

Confirm that the first payment actually reached the dormitory

In the first letter, Pavel asks for a notebook and soap. The reply button lets the father send cash. There is no separate errand to collect either item from the supply shop. Advance to the next letter for a delivery receipt in Pavel’s own words. In this recorded run he says the money arrived, he bought both supplies and sewed what was left into his pillow after deciding against keeping money in his locker. If you want to know where the transfer went, this sentence is better evidence than a change in the depot balance.

The photograph clipped to the first letter is his school portrait. He says the school gave him a haircut and he kept a copy for his father. Eight pupils share the room and the teacher collects outgoing letters on Fridays. That describes school life in the letter. The reply requires no photograph pickup or calendar advance at the depot.

What refusing the discipline-book fee actually changes

Compare two consecutive letters. In the first, Pavel says he fell asleep on night duty, spent the rest of the night outside and was entered in the discipline register. A clerk offered to erase the entry for a fee without a receipt. The recorded player refused. In the next letter the entry was still there and Pavel had been given two more duties. He had friends waking him in turns, so he stopped falling asleep on duty. The school had warned about another incident, but the refusal itself did not expel him in this run. The next request was for ointment for his swollen feet.

The footage separates the events: the bully broke his nose and the director assigned kitchen duty. The exposure outside followed the separate night-duty incident. That sequence explains why a request about his feet arrives after the fight and paperwork.

Check the school speech against Pavel’s account of his mother

Read the two different places named in Pavel’s letter before answering. The prepared school speech says his mother died at the front. Pavel says she died in a hospital and that he already told the teacher. She acknowledged knowing and handed him the text back. The on-screen replies are to read the prepared speech or refuse to lie about his mother. The player must choose which advice to give, even though the teacher knows.

The preceding paragraph also answers what happened after a missed ointment payment in this playthrough. Pavel says his feet mostly healed without it, still hurt when walking and he continued going on duty. If the foot letter was your last save, the speech letter is the next place to check on that injury.

What the infirmary offers a pupil who cannot pay for lice treatment

When the dormitory has lice, the letter describes two treatments. The infirmary supplies medicine in return for money. Pupils without money have their heads shaved and are washed in cold water outside. Pavel says this already happened to about half of the group and two boys went to the infirmary the following morning. These are events he witnessed. The letter itself does not say that those two boys included Pavel. The eight-unit Send button concerns medicine for him. He also gives his father an explicit alternative if money is short.

When Pavel keeps silent about the leaflet

Read the letter immediately following the decision about the leaflet. In this run Pavel refused to identify a source he did not know. The school locked him in the basement for two nights and then released him, but took the other boy away. The boy’s cupboard was emptied into a sack. He had previously given Pavel the little pocketknife. This explains why a new decision about the gift follows even after Pavel refused to inform on him. A later letter shows the director accepting the knife without asking about its origins.

Why the shaved pupils look away

In the letter about the confiscated leaflet, start with the opening paragraph. On this paid route Pavel says the medicine arrived, the lice are gone and his hair was left intact. The pupils whose heads were shaved avoid eye contact with him. This observation comes before he answers the question about reporting the leaflet. Farther down the page the school threatens the whole dormitory with punishment if no one tells them about the leaflet. The paragraph break separates the outcome of the last payment from the decision you are making now.

How quickly the purchased ointment worked

In the paid branch, the letter introducing the school speech first says Pavel bought the ointment. Three days later the swelling had gone down. A woman in the infirmary comments on the help his father sent. Read these opening lines when comparing two saves. A separate run without the payment describes continuing pain while walking. The three days are elapsed time in Pavel’s account. His father has no three-day waiting objective at the depot.

Why the exam request is for two books

Read beyond the account of the surrendered knife. The school has posted a list on its doors. Pavel says two exam books are required and neither is available at the library. He asks his father for help. The notice distinguishes the threat to pupils who fail the exam from the marking of pupils with disciplinary penalties. The book request has a money reply in the correspondence. There are no two books to search for at the depot.

Refusing the director and receiving opened envelopes

On this run Pavel tells the director that his correspondence with his father is private. His next surviving letter says the envelopes arrive already opened and some lines have been struck out. At the bottom of that same page he reports the promise of a school near the capital instead of the front. The subsequent Varenka appendix places him in the firing squad. This recorded combination shows the capital-school outcome can follow the privacy reply. The footage does not establish which other replies were necessary. Keep a capture of both the last letter and the appendix when comparing your own branch.

Answering that family comes first

The letter after the loyalty lesson says Pavel told the teacher he would not betray his family. This time his name went in the journal again, written in red. The director subsequently asked where his father worked and what he wrote. In another recorded shift the law-first answer resulted in the name being crossed out. Compare the description of the register before the director’s questions with the marked passages in his father’s correspondence. Those are two different documents.

Check the correction fee when the clerk gives no receipt

The school clerk proposes clearing a disciplinary entry for a payment and explicitly tells Pavel no receipt is issued. The confirmation comes in the next family letter on the paid branch. Pavel says he gave the money to that clerk, the entry was missing the next day and the director had started smiling at him. Preserve the two letters together. The second paragraph immediately asks about ointment for his feet. Sending the correction fee did not buy treatment for the injury. Look for the later letter about a reduction in swelling to confirm the separate medical payment.

Separate the fight's immediate result from the following discipline fee

In the Russian letter, Pavel reports fighting Grigory, suffering a broken nose and receiving a week of kitchen duty. The smaller boy gets his gloves back and sits beside him at meals. The request for money comes later in the same paper after another incident. Read both paragraphs before treating the fee as payment for the gloves or the original fight.

Pavel's Russian letter about Grigory, the gloves and kitchen duty
Original source ↗

Locate the second incident in the letter

After the kitchen assignment, Pavel says he fell asleep on night duty. The director kept him outside until morning and the school recorded the incident in its disciplinary register. The clerk then asks for a correction payment. A 0.95 wallet in the screenshot is below the requested 1.00, but the money shortage is unrelated to what caused the night punishment.

Night duty, overnight discipline and the clerk's request on the same page
Original source ↗

Check the next letter after missing the first payment

If Send is unavailable, read the cost beside it and the cash at the upper right. The recorded player had 0.16 against a 0.25 request. On the next letter Pavel says the money did not come, he borrowed a notebook from another pupil, and he will go without soap for another week. The letter then asks for advice about Grigory. You can still answer that new question. These lines identify the missed-payment branch without replaying the opening.

Sources

Related field notes